Legal Opinion
Smith v. State Board of Medicine
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 1953No. 7988PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIVENS, Justice.
Appellant’s amended complaint in essence alleged that he has a diploma granted him December 6, 1932 by the American School of Naturopathy, New York City, conferring upon him the degree of Doctor of Naturopathy; that he is duly qualified and legally entitled to practice Naturopathy. Then it alleged on information and belief that this School was founded September 15, 1896 and was an institution of learning organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, empowered to grant the degree of Naturopathy and was a recognized and reputable school of naturopathy. Followed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. HouckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. HenningOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weyandt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Crees v. California State Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- State ex rel. Collet v. ScopelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- State v. MaxfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.