Legal Opinion
State v. Nace
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 21, 1987No. C9-86-1323PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant was charged and found guilty of possession of a controlled substance (LSD) under Minn.Stat. §§ 152.09, subd. 1(2) (1984); 152.02, subd. 2(3) (1984); 152.-15, subd. 2(2) (1984); and of possession of marijuana in a motor vehicle under Minn. Stat. § 152.15, subd. 2(5) (1984). At the omnibus hearing appellant challenged admissibility of marijuana and LSD seized during a warrantless search of his car, claiming the officers lacked probable cause to search the car. The court found the evidence admissible.
The judge sentenced appellant to 28 months in prison, based on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SeifertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. BigelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. Pederson-MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. ColosimoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. SeifertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988