Legal Opinion
State v. Pederson-Maxwell
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 5, 2000No. C1-99-2112PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Appellant Tamara Gay Pederson-Max-well was convicted of two counts of fifth-degree controlled substance crime and one count of failure to affix controlled substance tax stamps in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 152.025, subds. 1(1), 2(1) and 3(a); 609.05, subd. 1; and 297D.09, subd. la (1998). On appeal, Pederson Maxwell claims the evidence should have been suppressed because it was the product of an improper search of her automobile.. We affirm.
FACTS
On July 10, 1998, at approximately 8:00 p.m., a confidential informant met with Crookston Police Department Detective…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Commonwealth v. NicholsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. BEARDEMPHLCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.