Mercadel v. Cain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Peter Mercadel appeals the district court’s denial of habeas relief on the merits of his claim that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel on direct appeal because his attorney filed only an errors-patent brief on his behalf. We conclude that Mercadel has failed to fairly present this claim to the Louisiana state courts, and therefore that he has failed to exhaust his state court remedies. We therefore vacate the district court’s judgment and remand with instructions to dismiss Mercadel’s habeas application without prejudice to allow him to exhaust his remedies in Louisiana…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Angel Sellan v. Robert KuhlmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Gary Paul Cassett v. Terry L. Stewart, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Pirtle v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Valdez v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Aparicio v. ArtuzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.