Legal Opinion

St. Charles Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1935No. Appeal, No. 19PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

The question to be answered in this case as a result of the appeal of Ethel M. Hamilton, one of the defendants, is whether the Deficiency Judgment Act of January 17, 1934, P. L. 243, 21 P. S., section 806, applies where a property is sold at sheriff’s sale on December 23, 1933, before the passage of the act and the sheriff acknowledges the deed on February 8, 1934, after the act was in effect. The learned president judge of the court below held that the statute did not apply.

The act provides: “That whenever any real property is sold on any execution on the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Stroup v. RaymondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Collins ex rel. Hill v. London Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Bellas v. M'CartySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  5. Grakelow v. NashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. Broad Street HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. G.A.G. Corp. v. AurittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. G.A.G. Corp. v. AurittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API