Legal Opinion

Grakelow v. Nash

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1929No. Appeal 250PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This ejectment was tried without a jury under the Act of April 22, 1874, P. L. 109. Plaintiff appeals from judgment for defendant, who stands on a tax-title; if that title is valid, plaintiff cannot recover; if invalid, plaintiff is entitled to judgment. “He who claims real estate by virtue of a tax-title must be able to point to a substantial compliance with all the essential requisites provided in the statute” (Osmer v. Sheasley, 219 Pa. 390, 395) authorizing the sale. The decision of this appeal depends on the proper construction of the Act of May 11, 1911, P. L. 257.

To…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Davidson, Exrx. v. BrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Gratz v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Fleming v. ParrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  5. Matis v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Babcock Lumber Co. v. FaustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Proctor v. Sagamore Big Game ClubDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Woodhouse Hunting Club, Inc. v. Hoyt Royalty, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. B. L. Assn. v. Hamilton (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Stump v. StumpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API