Legal Opinion

Magnus v. Woolery

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1896No. 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. T. J. Humes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*44The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

This was an action upon a sheriff’s bond, for damages occasioned by neglect of official duties. The facts upon which the same is founded are as follows : The plaintiffs began an action in replevin and the respondent Woolery, as sheriff, took possession of the property under the writ therein issued, and subsequently returned the same to the defendant in said action upon receiving from him a re-delivery bond, but did hot require the sureties thereon to justify. The plaintiffs obtained judgment in said cause for a return of the property, or in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carter v. DugganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Babcock, Cornish & Co. v. UrquhartWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Belt v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API