Legal Opinion

Carter v. MacMillan Oil Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 19, 1984No. 83-992PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict following a jury verdict awarding him $10,500 in actual damages and $5000 in punitive damages in a malicious prosecution action. The trial court’s ruling granting that motion was based on its conclusion that its instructions to the jury permitted recovery on an improper legal theory. In. addition, the trial court sustained an alternative motion for new trial on the same ground. We hold that an incorrect legal theory was submitted to the jury, but that the proper remedy is a new trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Goetzman v. WichernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Briner v. HyslopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Stenberg v. BuckleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  5. Shinrone, Inc. v. Tasco, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Springer v. Weeks and Leo Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Hulme v. BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Tratchel v. Essex Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Gail v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API