Legal Opinion
Hulme v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided December 20, 1989No. 88-1841PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Justice.
This appeal arises out of the dismissal of an employee’s three claims of discrimination against her employer made pursuant to Iowa Code chapter 601A, the Iowa Civil Rights Act (Act). The two major issues before us are (1) whether a thirty-nine year old individual can allege a valid age discrimination claim under the Act, and (2) whether, after securing a release from the Iowa Civil Rights Commission (commission) to sue claiming a discriminatory reduction in her hours, the employee may then allege additional claims arising from her subsequent discharge without obtaining…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Steven OUBICHON, Appellant, v. NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Loyd S. DACE, Appellant, v. ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Nancy M. Kratzer v. Rockwell Collins, Inc., David A. Bellendier, and Eugene R. NedvedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Vivian v. MadisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Janet R. Kerns v. Capital Graphics, Inc., Doing Business as Clarinda CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Landals v. George A. Rolfes Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Deboom v. Raining Rose, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.