Legal Opinion
Habelt v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 31, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00776Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARK HABELT, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00776-EMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 IRHYTHM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Docket No. 55 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Lead Plaintiff Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi brings this class action 15 on behalf of similarly situated investors against Defendant iRhythm and Individual Defendants 16 King, Coyle and Devine (current or former corporate officers of iRhythm) to recover damages for 17 Defendants’ alleged violations of federal…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.