Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of McCoy
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 20, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Henderson, S.
Two creditors have objected to the account of the executrix, Vera Thomas McCoy. The claim of one was allowed in full by the executrix and its objections are addressed to alleged omissions in Schedule A.
The testator’s former wife filed a claim for arrears due under an agreement for her support by the decedent. This claim is not disputed. Subsequently she filed a claim in a larger sum for arrears alleged to be due under an earlier agreement of like nature.
Under date of November 24, 1923, while the decedent and the claimant were married but living apart, they executed an agreement…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Claim of Raymond v. Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Schenck v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Schuttinger v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Schnell v. . PerlmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- In Re the Accounting of WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of ZalaznickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- In re the Estate of GoodwinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of CoyleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- Israel v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Am-Lon Knit Goods Finishing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1980