Fidanque v. STATE, GOVT. STANDARDS & PRACTICES
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
Plaintiffs are two paid lobbyists for the American Civil Liberties Union. They brought this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, seeking a judicial determination that ORS 171.743, 1 a statute requiring certain lobbyists to pay a biennial registration fee to the Oregon Government Standards and Practices Commission (Commission), is constitutionally unsound. Plaintiffs based their complaint on two provisions of the Oregon Constitution — sections 8 and 26 of Article I — and on the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 2 On cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Vannatta v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Newport Church of the Nazarene v. HensleyOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Vermont Society of Ass'n Executives v. MilneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.