Legal Opinion

Vannatta v. Oregon Government Ethics Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2009No. CC 07C20464; CA A140080; SC S057570PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

Plaintiffs Fred Vannatta and Center To Protect Free Speech, Inc., brought this action for declaratory and injunc-tive relief, asserting that ORS 244.025(1) - (4) and ORS 244.042 (which, in general terms, regulate the solicitation, offering, and receipt of gifts by certain public and other persons) violate Article I, sections 8 and 26, of the Oregon Constitution and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and therefore are unenforceable. We discuss the content of those statutes in greater detail below.

The trial court rejected plaintiffs’ constitutional arguments and granted…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Thunderbird Mobile Club, LLC v. City of WilsonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. MoyerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Multnomah County v. MehrweinOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Hazell v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Markley v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API