Legal Opinion

Roe v. King

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 21, 1933No. 42170PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

While the defendant-appellee, Kate M. King, was the owner of forty-five shares of stock in the State Bank of Blairsburg, that institution became insolvent and closed its doors. On June 5, 1928, L.- A. Andrew, the superintendent of banking, was duly appointed receiver of the bank, as required by law, L. A. Andrew as such receiver, on November 19, 1929, obtained an order of court assessing the stockholders of the bank, including the appellee, one hundred per cent. As a part of the assessment, and when the same was made, the district court entered judgment thereon against the appellee in. favor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. TarbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Andrew v. State Bank of Swea CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Boyce v. Farmers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Raymond v. WhitehouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Jansen v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  2. Hood Ex Rel. United Bank & Trust Co. v. Richardson Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Decker v. DomoneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Wagner ex rel. Molner v. South Chicago Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  5. Wagner ex rel. Molner v. South Chicago Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API