Legal Opinion

In Re Golden Peanut Co., LLC

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2009No. 09-0122PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

The decedent in this wrongful death suit was a party to an employee benefit plan that contained an agreement to arbitrate any personal injury or wrongful death claims against his employer, a nonsubscri-ber to workers’ compensation insurance. The trial court denied the employer’s motion to compel arbitration of the family members’ claims, and the court of appeals denied mandamus relief, concluding that the wrongful death beneficiaries did not sign the arbitration agreement and were not bound by it. 269 S.W.3d 302. Given our subsequent holding in In re Labatt Food Service, L.P., 279 S.W.3d 640…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. In Re Labatt Food Service, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. L & L Kempwood Associates, L.P. v. Omega Builders, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re Golden Peanut Co., LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2008

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Odyssey Healthcare, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Pinto Technology Ventures, L.P. v. SheldonTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. ReadyOne Industries, Inc. v. Joel Antonio Flores, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
  5. Readyone Industries, Inc. v. CasillasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API