Legal Opinion

Hales v. North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 7, 1993No. 9210SC654PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The determinative issue on appeal is whether the 1986 judgment in the declaratory judgment action brought by William I. Hales against Interstate bars plaintiffs’ claims against the Association in the present case under the doctrine of res judicata. We hold that it does.

The law with respect to summary judgment is well established. “ ‘Where a motion for summary judgment is granted, the critical questions for determination upon appeal are whether on the basis of the materials presented to the trial court, there is a genuine issue as to any material fact and whether the movant is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Oliver v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Wilder v. HobsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hales v. North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API