Legal Opinion

Wilmington Transp. Co. v. Edwards

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1938No. 8601PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree holding the steamship Catalina solely liable for a collision with the motorboat Arbutus occurring in a dense fog in the traffic way between San Pedro on the California coast and Catalina Island. The only question presented by the briefed assignments of error is whether the Catalina was solely at fault.

The collision occurred at about 5 p. m. o’clock in a fog in a visibility of a distance of between 100 and 150 yards when the vessels sighted one another. The Catalina, a 1,765 gross ton passenger steamship, 301 feet long, on a trip from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. The AriadneSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. The OttawaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. The Ernest H. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. St. John v. PaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1851

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Intagliata v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Carr v. Hermosa Amusement Corporation, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  3. Martug Towing Co. v. Eastern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  4. Albers Bros. Milling Co. v. HauptmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  5. Larsson v. Coastwise (Pacific Far East) LineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API