Legal Opinion
The Ernest H. Meyer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1936No. 7590PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
84 F.2d 496 (1936)
THE ERNEST H. MEYER.[*]
THE EUREKA.
BROUGHTON & WIGGINS NAV. CO.
v.
HAMMOND LUMBER CO.
No. 7590.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 10, 1936.
Lillick, Olson, Levy & Geary and Jos. J. Geary, all of San Francisco, Cal. (Gilbert C. Wheat, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellants.
Resleure, Vivell & Pinckney, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal in a case of collision between the sister cargo steamers, the Eureka and Ernest H. Meyer, shown by the evidence to have equal power…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- The ChattahoocheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Yeaton and Others, of the Schooner General Pinkney and Cargo v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- The AriadneSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Petterson Lighterage & T. Corp. v. New York Central R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- The President MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- The Silver PalmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Carr v. Hermosa Amusement Corporation, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.