Legal Opinion
United States v. Farinas
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 9, 1969No. 68 CR. 927PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendant moves herein to dismiss the indictment charging him with a violation of the Selective Service Act of 1967, for a bill of particulars, and for discovery and inspection. Inasmuch as it is the opinion of this Court that the indictment lodged herein is too vague in its language to enable the defendant to properly prepare his defense, defendant’s other motions need not be considered at this time.
The indictment in this case provides:
“The Grand Jury charges:
On or about the 13th day of August, 1968, and up to and including the date of the filing of this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. John Cimino and Joseph D'ErcolECourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Frank Diecidue, Larry Neil Miller, Frank Boni, Jr., A/K/A "Mustache Frankie," Manuel Gispert, Anthony Antone, and Homer Rex DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Mildwoff v. CunninghamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- United States v. Robert Edward JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. FarinasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- United States v. Juan Pedro FarinasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.