Coles Trading Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
In a suit by a sublessor against a sub-lessee the district court held that the sub-lessee was not obligated to perform certain of the sublessor’s covenants in the overlying lease, where the sublessee had taken “subject to the terms of” such lease, but did not assume the performance of the particular sublessor’s covenants in question ; and from such determination, the sublessor appeals.
The original or overlying lease was between J. W. Dorris and his wife as lessors and the corporation, that later changed its name to the Coles Trading Company, as lessee.
Subsequently, the Coles Trading Company…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consolidated Coal Co. v. PeersIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Davidson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- S. T. McKnight Co. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Shreck v. CoatesArizona Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by7 opinions
- Steven Voloudakis and Katherine Voloudakis v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Shadeland Development Corp. v. MeekIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- American Community Stores Corp. v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Begnaud v. HillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Weeks v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.