Legal Opinion

Shadeland Development Corp. v. Meek

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1986No. 4-1084A289PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellees Mary R. Meek and J. Perry Meek Realty Co., Inc. (the Meeks) brought suit against defendants-appellants Shadeland Development Corp. and Holiday Inns, Inc., claiming damages arising from an alleged breach of a 60 year lease of commercial/motel property in Indianapolis, Indiana. The Meeks were owner-lessors of the property. Shadeland was a tenant under the lease but transferred its interest in the lease to another company, San Antonio Inns, Inc., which subsequently defaulted in rent payments. The Meeks alleged that the assignment of the lease by Shadeland was a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hancock v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Rauch v. Circle TheatreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Young v. Van ZandtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Shrum v. DaltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Reeder v. RamseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Keith v. MendusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Fay Corp. v. Bat Holdings I, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
  3. Fields v. ConfortiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Port Authority of St. Paul v. HarstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. American Community Stores Corp. v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API