Pelkey v. General Electric Capital Assurance Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Jack Dean Pelkey appeals from the grant of a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Mead, J.) in favor of General Electric Capital Assurance Company. Pelkey contends that the court erred in construing his insurance contract with General Electric Capital Assurance to exclude coverage for the accidental loss of his leg because his pre-existing condition contributed to the loss. Because the policy is ambiguous on the impact of pre-existing conditions, we vacate the judgment.
I. CASE HISTORY
[¶ 2] The case history is developed from the parties’ jointly stipulated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kangas v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Acadia Insurance Co. v. Buck Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Ellice v. INA Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Hall v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Geyerhahn v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kellogg v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Dawn M. Harlor v. Amica Mutual Insurance COmpanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Korhonen v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. BryantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Penn-America Insurance v. LavigneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.