Legal Opinion
O'Conor v. Roark
California Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1895No. 19556PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County denying a motion to discharge and quash a writ of attachment. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion to discharge and quash a writ of attachment issued in the above-entitled action, on the ground that the affidavit upon which the writ was issued is defective and insufficient. The following is a copy of the affidavit:
“IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
“Andrew J. O’Conor, being duly sworn, says that he is the plaintiff in the above-entitled action; that the defendant,.Ellen Roark, in the said action, is indebted to him in the sum of seven thousand seven hundred and *176fifty dollars, over and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bank of California v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Flagg v. DareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tyson v. ReineckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Finch v. McVeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- O'Conor v. WitherbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896