Legal Opinion

Coors Brewing Co. v. Stroh

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2001No. C031851PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, P. J.

By petition for a writ of mandate, the Coors Brewing Company (Coors) seeks to invalidate an amended regulation of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (the Department) that effectively will prohibit alcoholic beverage licensees from continuing to conduct promotional contests in which cash prizes are given to consumers. Coors contends that the regulation (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 4, § 106), which we will refer to as rule 106, must be struck down because it exceeds the scope of its enabling statute, Business and Professions Code section 25600. (Further section…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Rice v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. English v. Ikon Business Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Alameda County Social Services Agency v. Willis H.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Paterno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Miller Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API