Sturdevant v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
The issue in this case is not whether the defendant committed the offense charged, but rather it is whether the Staté of Wisconsin has jurisdiction to try a Menominee Indian for an offense committed outside the boundaries of the Menominee Reservation, but within the boundaries of the state.
The fact that the defendant is an enrolled member of the Menominee Tribe is undisputed. This case does not involve the question of this state’s jurisdiction over crimes alleged to have been committed by a Menominee Indian on the Menominee Reservation or in “Indian country” as that term is defined by federal…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Organized Village of Kake v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Ramon Torres and Tony FishCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- M.L.S. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Opinion No. Oag 10-81, (1981), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1981
- In Interest of MLSCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Opinion No. Oag 27-92, (1992), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.