Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 10-81, (1981)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided March 11, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL CORNETT, District Attorney Shawano and Menominee Counties

You have asked several questions concerning the relationship between Menominee County and the Menominee Indian Tribe. Your questions will be answered seriatim.

1. Do state, county, and local law enforcement agencies have authority to execute warrants and bench warrants issued by the Menominee Tribal Court?

For the reasons that follow, it is my opinion that state law enforcement agencies now have no statutory authority to execute warrants issued by the Menominee Tribal Court.

The Menominee Tribe is a federally recognized Indian tribe.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Opinion No. Oag 50-85, (1985), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1985
  2. Opinion No. Oag 57-81, (1981), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API