Legal Opinion

Fox v. General Motors, Corp.

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided April 19, 2000No. 5:97-cv-00014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BROADWATER, District Judge.

I

This matter is pending before the Court on the parties’ post-trial motions. The defendant, General Motors Corporation (GM), filed a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (Doc. No. 113). The plaintiff, Robert J. Fox (Fox), filed a motion for judgment on the verdict and to correct clerical error in judgment (Doc. No. 115). After receiving the parties’ memoranda of law, a hearing was held on October 29, 1999. For reasons set forth below, the Court concludes that the defendant’s motion should be denied and that the plaintiffs motion…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Elizabeth M. Paroline v. Unisys Corporation Edgar L. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  5. Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sandra Spragis Flowers v. Southern Regional Physician Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. Robel v. Roundup Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Robel v. Roundup Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Flowers v. So Regn Physn SvcsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API