Legal Opinion
State v. Shamsie
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided January 9, 1997No. 03-95-00752-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
The State of Texas appeals from the trial court’s order suppressing evidence seized from appellee, Humayen Shamsie. See Tex. Code Crim.Proe. § 44.01(a)(5) (West Supp. 1997). The trial court granted Shamsie’s motion to suppress the evidence on the ground that it was obtained when officers detained Shamsie without reasonable suspicion, in violation of the federal and state constitutions and the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. We will affirm the order.
BACKGROUND
One early morning in July 1995, Shamsie was at a dance club, Eden 2000. Several officers of the Austin Police…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Armstrong v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- In re A.T.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.