Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Edwin Meese, Attorney General of the United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge.
Sable Communications of California (Sable) filed this action in district court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Sable claims that a statute and FCC regulation restricting its sexually suggestive telephone services violate its first amendment rights. The district court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction and, alternatively, on the ground that the case was not justiciable. This court has jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- San Diego County Gun Rights Committee v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Culinary Workers Union v. Del PapaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- American Road & Transportation Builders Association v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. Stephen Paul DuniferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Smith v. T-MOBILE USA INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.