Legal Opinion
United States v. Stephen Paul Dunifer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 20, 2000No. 99-15035PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Stephen Paul Dunifer (“Dunifer”) appeals from the district court’s summary judgment granting injunctive and declaratory relief in favor of the United States in this action brought under § 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 301, which prohibits the operation of a radio station without a Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) license. 1 Dunifer contends that the district court erred in ruling that he lacked standing to challenge the statutory validity and constitutionality of FCC licensing regulations as a defense to the government’s action. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wilson v. A. H. Belo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- CE Design, Ltd. v. PRISM BUSINESS MEDIA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Mark S. Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2025
- United States v. Jerry SzokaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Ruggiero v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.