Legal Opinion
Shirley v. McCraney
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided December 28, 2001No. 3:97-cv-00124PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WINGATE, District Judge.
Before this court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 The defendants are W. Thomas McCraney, Jr., M.D., and Capital Or-thopaedic Clinic, P.A. The plaintiffs here are John Shirley and Martha Shirley, husband and wife. Plaintiffs oppose defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Nevertheless, for the reasons set out below, this court is persuaded to grant defendants’ motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs filed this medical malpractice action in state court on November…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roth v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005