Legal Opinion
State v. Vick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 30, 2001No. C7-99-1949PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
In May 1999, respondent Edwin Olaf Vick was found guilty by a jury and convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of MinmStat. § 609.343, subd. 1(a) (2000). Vick petitioned for postconviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel and insufficient evidence to support the conviction. The posteonvietion court denied Vick’s petition. Vick subsequently appealed his conviction to the court of appeals, arguing that the trial court committed plain error when it admitted unnoticed and unproven Spreigl evidence. Vick also appealed the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Schleicher v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. QuickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.