Legal Opinion

United States v. Bright

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 28, 2005No. ARMY 20000341PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MERCK, Senior Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of making a false official statement (two specifications), sodomy, assault with the intent to commit rape, indecent acts with another (two specifications), and communicating a threat, in violation of Articles 107, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 925, and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The members sentenced appellant to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for six years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. BauerbachArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  5. United States v. FaganCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BrightArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
  2. United States v. Sergeant SCOTT K. STOKESArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API