Legal Opinion

United States v. Bright

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 29, 2006No. ARMY 20000341PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW

OLMSCHEID, Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of making a false official statement (two specifications), sodomy, assault with the intent to commit rape, indecent acts (two specifications), and communicating a threat, in violation of Articles 107, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 925, and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The panel members sentenced appellant to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for six years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Private E1 AARON A. NEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010
  2. United States v. Private First Class DONALD P. LAVIOLETArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API