Legal Opinion
United States v. Fassoulis
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 13, 1962PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C., for an order granting him a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence and in the interest of justice. He was convicted on October 11, 1960 after a five-day trial before then District Court Judge Irving R. Kaufman, without a jury, of having devised a scheme to defraud one A. Mitchell Liftig by means of false representations and having caused the transmission of interstate wire communications to execute the fraudulent scheme. 1 He was sentenced to two years in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Weiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Corcoran v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Nick Dipaolo and Edward WeatherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Gemveto Jewelry Co. v. Jeff Cooper, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Clark v. IrvinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- United States v. KeoghDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- United States v. MunchakDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.