Legal Opinion
United States v. Keogh
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 14, 1967No. 61 Cr. 1113PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Petitioner, James "Vincent Keogh, and two codefendants, Elliott Kahaner and Antonio Corallo, were convicted in 1962 of conspiracy to obstruct the due administration of justice. The judgment of conviction was affirmed upon appeal, 1 and certiorari denied. 2 Keogh now seeks a writ of error coram nobis 3 to vacate the judgment of con viction and for a new trial upon the grounds that the prosecution knowingly (1) suppressed exculpatory evidence, and (2) used and sponsored perjured testimony.
Familiarity is assumed with the summary of evidence in the Court of…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. MunchakDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- United States v. Saul I. BirnbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.