Legal Opinion
United States v. Munchak
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 28, 1972No. 69 Cr. 90PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
This second motion for a new trial, based upon alleged perjury by a government witness and alleged newly discovered evidence, is made after the Court of Appeals affirmed the defendant’s judgment of conviction, 1 as well as the denial of the prior motion for a new trial, based also upon alleged perjury of other witnesses, employees of the defendant.
Defendant was found guilty on December 30, 1969, after a seven-day jury trial on one count of a four-count indictment charging mail fraud violations. 2 Two counts, which concerned transistors labelled “JAN CGO…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States ex rel. Regina v. LaValleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. MarquezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- United States v. MunchakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Corso v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Bolling v. TernulloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.