Legal Opinion

Cook v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1944No. 45515PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

In August 1939 the President appointed plaintiff an acting assistant surgeon in the Navy for temporary service under the act of May 4, 1898 (30 Stat. 369, 380; U. S. Code, Title 34, section 21). The appointment specifically stated: “This .appointment to continue in force during the pleasure of the Secretary of the Navy.” While serving under this appointment plaintiff became incapacitated as a result of an incident •of the service, and he was examined for retirement and was placed on the retired list of officers of the Navy as of March 1, 1941, as set forth in findings 3 to 6, inclusive. This…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Cerecedo Hermanos Y CompañiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Robertson v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Taylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1903
  5. Robbins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Francis G. Brown v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Lemly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  4. Carlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  5. Spencer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API