Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Horton v. Prendergast
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
Preliminary to the institution of a proceeding to condemn lands belonging to relators, application was made to the Public Service Commission by respondent Niagara, Lockport and Ontario Power Company for such a certificate of necessity as is provided by section 624, subdivision 3, of the Conservation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 65) as amended by chapter 242 of the Laws of 1923. The application was granted and the Commission certified and determined that relators’ real property is necessary for the full development and utilization of a certain single undeveloped water power site on the Salmon river in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- People v. . Adirondack Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Adirondack Railway Co. v. New York StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Matter of Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Pocantico Water Works Co. v. BirdNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nash v. . TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Nash v. Town of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Neptune Associates, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kohlasch v. New York State Thruway AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.