Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Turner
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided March 27, 1919PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Error to a.judgment of the Hustings Court of city of Petersburg, in a proceeding by motion for a judgment for money. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.
Joseph L. Rosenberg let to contract the construction of a hotel in the city of Petersburg, according to plans and specifications which were made a part of the contract. Haymes Bros., general contractors, agreed to furnish all the materials and labor and do a complete job for a stated sum agreed upon with Rosenberg. The specifications, amongst others, contained the following clauses:
Under the title of “Excavating and Grading:”
“The contractors shall visit the site of the building and examine for himself the condition of the lot, and satisfy himself as to the nature of the soil.
“Excavate to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ferguson & Fries v. GoochSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- E. I. Du Pont, etc., Co. v. Snead's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Richlands Flint Glass Co. v. HiltebeitelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Oriental Lumber Co. v. Blades Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- Consumers Ice Co. v. JenningsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Main v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Yorke v. MaynardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Henderson v. FosterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Sweeney Co. v. Engineers-Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.