Legal Opinion
Sweeney Co. v. Engineers-Constructors, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 20, 1987No. 86-2670PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Circuit Judge:
This case concerns the justification necessary for and the damages flowing from the termination of a construction subcontractor by the general contractor. Appellants Engineers-Constructors, Inc., Renten-bach Constructors, Inc., and Federal Insurance Company (collectively “RCI”) appeal the decision of the district court, sitting without a jury, that RCI wrongfully terminated a subcontractor, appellee Sweeney Company of Maryland (“Sweeney”), on a construction job in Richmond, Virginia. *806The district court also found against RCI on its counterclaim against Sweeney and its…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sweeney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Inman v. Binghamton Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sweeney Company Of Maryland v. Engineers-Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Dator Corporation v. Rufus S. Lusk & Son, Incorporated, Rufus S. Lusk & Son, Incorporated v. Dator Corporation React Service Corporation Reach Corporation Michael L. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Miller & Long, Inc. v. Intracoastal Living, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2011
- Sweeney Company of Maryland v. Engineers-Constructors, Inc. Rentenbach Constructors, Inc. Federal Insurance Company, Sweeney Company of Maryland v. Engineers-Constructors, Inc. Rentenbach Constructors, Inc. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989