Legal Opinion
Firemen's Insurance v. Blount
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 13, 1936No. 11247PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
Several insurance companies, including Firemen’s Insurance Company, jointly issued a policy of fire insurance *460to Mrs. Nannie Blount. For convenience these companies will be referred to in the singular, as the insurer. The property insured was a dwelling-house. The house was damaged by lire, and in a suit on the policy a verdict was returned in favor of Mrs. Blount. The insurer filed a motion for new trial, which the court overruled, and this judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Firemen’s Insurance Co. v. Blount, 52 Ga. App. 223 (183 S. E. 111). Certiorari .was granted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Mutual Insurance v. TurnleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Sentinel Fire Insurance v. McRobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Hayes v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Tedder v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York Underwriters Insurance v. NolesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Cordell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- G. M. S. Realty Corp. v. Girard Fire & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
- National Fire Insurance Co. v. FarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Firemen's Insurance v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936