Cordell v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
On October 16, 1934, Henry Cordell filed a petition against the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. The defendant demurred on general and special grounds. Before this demurrer was passed on, the plaintiff offered an amendment which was allowed subject to demurrer. The defendant renewed the first demurrer, and demurred on additional grounds to the petition as amended. The court sustained all the grounds of both demurrers, except one special ground, and dismissed the petition. The plaintiff assigns error upon the sustaining of each and every ground of the two demurrers. In the petition as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Weed v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Marthinson v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Royal Insur. Co. v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Stanley v. Sterling Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Corson v. Anchor Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sargent v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Browder v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Schneider v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Hewitt Contracting Co. v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.