Legal Opinion

Archibald McCallum & Son v. Culpepper & Dupont

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Duval county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the •court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mabry, J.:

Action in assumpsit by Archibald McCallum and Kingsley McCallum, styling themselves, partners as Archibald McCallum & Son, against Andrew F. Culpepper and John E. Dupont, partners as Culpepper & Dupont. The declaration contained a special count on a note and also common counts. In connection with the suit a writ of attachment was issued and levied on certain goods, but this writ was dissolved by order of the court on motion made for that purpose. Dupont filed a plea, reciting therein that he was sued in assumpsit by summons ad respondendum issued on a given date, and alleging that…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nathan v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. Hayman v. WeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. First National Bank v. GreigSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
  4. Andre v. F. A. P. Jones Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API