Hayman v. Weil
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by Division B. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Parkhill, J.:
On the 23rd day of February, ,1900, the defendants in error, who will be known as the plaintiffs, commenced an action in the circuit court in and for Hillsborough county against the plaintiffs in error by filing the following praecipe for summons ad respondendum:
“In the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, in and for Hillsborough county.
E. A. Weil, Sol. Binswanger, and A. L. Weil, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of E. A. Weil & Company, v. W. C. Hayman, F. C. Armstrong, K. M. Hebb, J. W. Wilhelm, J. L. Wilhelm, S. D. Futch,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peck v. Stephenson's LesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
- McNealy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1879
- Livingston v. L'EngleSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
- Boykin v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Seedhouse v. BrowardSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ortell v. OrtellSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Bank of Jasper v. First Nat. Bank of RomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Sewell v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Nathan v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Lindsay v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.