Legal Opinion
Roukey v. Riley
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 5, 1950No. 3940PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lampeón, J.
The issue before us is whether the plaintiff can be found ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits because he is not available for work under the provisions of R. L., c. 218, s. 3, par. C, solely by reason of his being a member of the House of Representatives.
His legislative duties are performed in Concord, eighteen miles from Manchester, every two years, for a term extending from the first of January through the early or middle part of the ensuing summer. When in session, the members of the Legislature generally meet three days a week during which they attend not only the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Mee's Bakery, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Leonard v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1947
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sanchez v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Inter-Island Resorts, Ltd. v. AkahaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- St. Germain v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Nurmi v. Vermont Employment Security BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Pregent v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.