Legal Opinion
People v. Donato
New Rochelle City Court
Decided July 17, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Vincent R. Rippa, J.
Defendant Michael Donato is charged with multiple violations of section 213-5 (E) of the New Rochelle Code (the Code), *193which prohibits “unnecessary animal noise.” Numerous summonses for these violations were issued to defendant and a trial was held on January 27, 1998. At the conclusion of the trial, defendant made a motion to dismiss the charges against him, arguing that the applicable section of the Code is unconstitutionally void because of vagueness, and the parties were permitted to submit posttrial memoranda of law prior to the court rendering its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. IllardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. New York Trap Rock Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- 41 Kew Gardens Road Associates v. TyburskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Mayor of Aldermen v. WelchMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Town of Baldwin v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003