Legal Opinion
Mathis v. Bess
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 14, 1991No. 85 Civ. 4426 (RPP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, JR., District Judge.
Defendants have moved pursuant to Rule 3(j) of the Local Civil Rules for the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York for reargument of the Court’s Opinion and Order of March 28, 1991 on two grounds: (1) that the Court failed to address the qualified immunity defense of the individual stenographers and (2) that Shamel Atkins, joined as a plaintiff sua sponte by the Court, cannot assert claims for equitable relief because any such claims are now moot.
A motion for reargument should be directed to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jasper Roberson, Relator-Appellant v. State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Walentas v. LipperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re K & L Lakeland, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Mathis v. BessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- DeSimone v. Select Portfolio Servicing, IncDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025