Legal Opinion
Mathis v. Bess
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 15, 1991No. 85 Civ. 4426 (RPP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
In an Opinion and Order dated May 14, 1991 the Court ruled that defendants Donald Oshinsky, Linda Pazzani, Anna L. Bolgier, Joel Machlis, Rose Dunn, Anthony Moscato, Sanford Aranow and Michael Frankel (collectively “the individual stenographers”) were entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiffs’ due process claim against them and dismissed that claim. See Mathis v. Bess, 763 F.Supp. 58 (S.D.N.Y.1991). The Court ordered additional briefing on the issue of whether the individual stenographers were similarly entitled to qualified…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Francis v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re K & L Lakeland, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995