Legal Opinion

Cain v. Daly

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 9, 1906PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Complaint for injunction in original jurisdiction by B. D. Cain against Owen Daly, J. P. Broom, Jas. W. Dunning, T. H. Gibbes, J. M. Graham, Henry T. Thompson, E. H. Cain, E. A. Allworden, Chas. C. Stanley, Robert Moorman and B. P. McMaster. (oral argument). (oral argument).

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is a complaint in the original jurisdiction of this Court for an injunction to' restrain the prosecution of plaintiff for violation of sec. 501 of the Criminal Code, which declares that “no person or persons whatsoever shall publicly cry, show forth or expose to sale, any wares, merchandise, fruit, herbs, goods or chattels whatso'ever, upon the Lord’s D'ay, or any part thereof, upon pain that every person so offending shall forfeit the same goods so cried, or showed forth or exposed for sale.”

The defendants are the chief of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. Gate City Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Crighton v. DahmerMississippi Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Arnold v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. Harvie v. Heise, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. DeTREVILLE v. GROOVERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  4. Palmetto Golf Club v. Robinson, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  5. Stoval v. Sawyer, Chief Hwy. CommissionerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API